文章背景与核心概要
本文是入选 ICML 2026 的立场论文。作者指出,当前大语言模型(LLM)中普遍存在的缺陷——如谄媚性(sycophancy)、逻辑泛化能力不足以及自信的幻觉——其根源在于一种核心建模缺陷:即在孤立的单输出对上对模型进行评估和训练。
为了解决这些问题,本文提出了以“自洽性”(self-consistency)作为指导框架。研究表明,许多现有的旨在提升事实一致性和对抗鲁棒性的策略,本质上只是更广泛的“一致性优化”过程的子集。最终,作者勾勒了开发全局一致性大语言模型的路线图,强调了这一范式转变所能解锁的新能力,并探讨了潜在的挑战与异议。
观点:是时候优化大语言模型的自洽性了
摘要
Despite ever-increasing sophistication in language model (LM) pre- and post-training pipelines, many important failures persist: models overcondition on user framing ("sycophancy"), exhibit incomplete logical generalization, and produce confident but incorrect responses. We argue that these failures arise from a modeling assumption permeating all aspects of the pipeline: that behavior can be specified and evaluated independently on single-output pairs. Many model failures are difficult, if not impossible, to detect without reasoning about relationships between a model's responses across inputs. In this position paper, we propose self-consistency as a framework for understanding these failures. We first observe that a wide variety of techniques designed to improve specific aspects of LM behavior—targeting properties as diverse as adversarial robustness and factual coherence—can be understood as special cases of a common "consistency optimization" procedure and addressed with a standard set of optimization tools. We next outline a set of new model properties that could be achieved by optimizing for consistency, and conclude with a discussion of what it would mean to develop generally consistent LMs, including the capabilities they would enable and the objections they raise.
尽管语言模型(LM)的预训练和后训练流程日益复杂,但许多重要的缺陷依然存在:模型过度依赖用户设定的框架(即“谄媚性”)、表现出不完整的逻辑泛化能力,并产生自信但错误的回答。我们认为,这些失败源于贯穿整个流程的一种建模假设:即行为可以在孤立的单输出对上进行指定和评估。如果不去推理模型在不同输入下响应之间的关系,许多模型故障是难以甚至无法检测到的。在这篇立场论文中,我们提出了“自洽性”作为理解这些失败的框架。我们首先观察到,许多旨在改善 LM 特定行为的技术(涵盖对抗鲁棒性和事实一致性等多种属性)都可以被理解为一种通用的“一致性优化”过程的特例,并可以通过一套标准的优化工具来解决。接下来,我们概述了一系列通过优化一致性可以实现的新模型属性,并总结了开发全局一致性 LM 的意义,包括它们将解锁的能力以及可能引发的异议。
论文元数据
| 字段 | 详情 |
|---|---|
| arXiv 标识符 | arXiv:2608.05188 [cs.CL] |
| 主要学科 | 计算与语言 (cs.CL), 人工智能 (cs.AI) |
| 会议 | 第 43 届国际机器学习会议 (ICML 2026), 立场论文轨道 |
| 提交日期 | 2026 年 7 月 31 日 |
| 作者 | Itamar Pres, Belinda Z. Li, Laura Ruis, Zifan Carl Guo, Keya Hu, Mehul Damani, Isha Puri, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Jacob Andreas |
全文链接与资源
- PDF: 查看 PDF
- HTML (实验性): arXiv HTML
- TeX 源码: arXiv 源码
- 许可协议: 知识共享署名 4.0
