跳转至

文章背景与核心概要

自我进化为预训练语言模型提供了一条可扩展的途径,使其能够在极少外部监督的情况下增强推理能力。然而,传统方法要么依赖人工精心策划的教师生成训练数据集,要么依赖启发式的难度指标,这并不能保证求解器模型获得真正的性能提升。

为了解决这些局限性,作者推出了 INFUSER,这是一个围绕两个协同演进组件构建的迭代式联合训练框架:1. 生成器(Generator):从一组非结构化的、自动收集的文档池中草拟问题和参考标准答案;2. 求解器(Solver):通过对生成的问题进行训练来提高其推理能力。实验表明,基于 Qwen3-8B-Base 评估,INFUSER 在奥林匹克数学和 SuperGPQA 基准测试中取得了超过 20% 的相对性能提升,展现出极强的灵活性和泛化能力。


INFUSER: Influence-Guided Self-Evolution Improves Reasoning

INFUSER: Influence-Guided Self-Evolution Improves Reasoning

arXiv: 2606.09052 [cs.LG]
Authors: Siyu Chen, Miao Lu, Beining Wu, Heejune Sheen, Fengzhuo Zhang, Shuangning Li, Zhiyuan Li, Jose Blanchet, Tianhao Wang, Zhuoran Yang
Submission History: Submitted on June 8, 2026; last revised August 21, 2026 (v4).
Links: View PDF | GitHub Repository | DOI

arXiv: 2606.09052 [cs.LG]
Authors: Siyu Chen, Miao Lu, Beining Wu, Heejune Sheen, Fengzhuo Zhang, Shuangning Li, Zhiyuan Li, Jose Blanchet, Tianhao Wang, Zhuoran Yang
Submission History: Submitted on June 8, 2026; last revised August 21, 2026 (v4).
Links: View PDF | GitHub Repository | DOI


Summary

Summary

自我进化为预训练语言模型提供了一条可扩展的途径,使其能够在极少外部监督的情况下增强推理能力。然而,传统方法要么依赖精心策划的教师生成训练数据集,要么依赖无法保证求解器模型获得真正改进的启发式难度指标。

Self-evolution offers a scalable pathway for pre-trained language models to enhance their reasoning capabilities with minimal external supervision. However, traditional approaches either rely on curated, teacher-generated training datasets or depend on heuristic difficulty metrics that do not guarantee genuine improvements in the solver model.

为了解决这些局限性,作者推出了 INFUSER,这是一个迭代式的联合训练框架,围绕两个协同且共同进化的组件构建: 1. 生成器(Generator): 从一组非结构化的、自动收集的文档池中草拟问题和参考标准答案。 2. 求解器(Solver): 通过对生成的问题进行训练来提升其推理能力。

To address these limitations, the authors introduce INFUSER, an iterative co-training framework built around two synergistic, co-evolving components: 1. The Generator: Drafts questions and reference golden answers sourced from a pool of unstructured, automatically collected documents. 2. The Solver: Improves its reasoning capabilities by training on the generated questions.

Key Innovations

  • 优化器感知的影响力评分: 生成器不再仅仅依赖难度启发式方法,而是通过影响力评分获得奖励,该评分决定了提出问题是否会真正改善目标分布上的求解器。
  • 双重归一化 GRPO(DuGRPO): 为了处理影响力评分连续且本身带有噪声的特性,作者专门为生成器训练提出了一种群组相对策略优化(GRPO)的双重归一化变体。
  • 自适应课程: 这些组件共同将文档池动态转换为有针对性的课程,该课程偏爱有利于求解器当前状态的问题,而不仅仅是关注任意的难度。

Key Innovations

  • Optimizer-Aware Influence Scoring: Rather than simply relying on difficulty heuristics, the generator is rewarded using an influence score that determines whether a proposed question will genuinely improve the solver on the target distribution.
  • DuGRPO (Dual-Normalized GRPO): To handle the continuous and inherently noisy nature of the influence score, the authors propose a dual-normalized variant of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) specifically for generator training.
  • Adaptive Curriculum: Together, these components dynamically transform the document pool into a targeted curriculum that favors questions beneficial to the current state of the solver rather than just focusing on arbitrary difficulty.

Results

  • Qwen3-8B-Base 上进行评估时,与强大的自我进化基线相比,INFUSER 在奥林匹克竞赛和 SuperGPQA 基准测试中实现了超过 20% 的相对提升
  • 通过 INFUSER 共同进化的 8B 模型在数学和编程任务上的表现优于被冻结的 32B 思考生成器。
  • 消融实验证实了每个架构组件的必要性,框架的扩展(例如将 INFUSER 应用于指令微调的锚点或利用可规则验证的 RLVR 数据)证明了其强大的灵活性和泛化能力。

Results

  • Evaluated on Qwen3-8B-Base, INFUSER achieves over a 20% relative improvement on Olympiad and SuperGPQA benchmarks compared to strong self-evolution baselines.
  • An 8B model co-evolving via INFUSER outperforms a frozen 32B thinking generator on mathematics and coding tasks.
  • Ablation studies confirm the necessity of each architectural component, and framework extensions (such as applying INFUSER to an instruction-finetuned anchor or leveraging rule-verifiable RLVR data) demonstrate its strong flexibility and generalizability.

Additional Metadata

Additional Metadata

  • 学科领域(Subjects): 机器学习 (cs.LG);人工智能 (cs.AI);计算与语言 (cs.CL);计算机科学与博弈论 (cs.GT);机器学习 (stat.ML)
  • 评论(Comments): 67 页,17 张图表
  • 许可证(License): 知识共享署名 4.0 license icon 查看许可证)
  • Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
  • Comments: 67 pages, 17 figures
  • License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (license icon view license)