PsychJail:通过大模型策略的多轮说服探索心理学越狱
文章背景与核心概要
随着大语言模型(LLM)越来越多地在教育、医疗和政策咨询等互动场景中担任持续的社会对话者,传统的单轮提示词优化已难以应对新兴的安全风险。
本文引入了 PsychJail,这是一个新型红蓝对抗框架,它利用基于心理学的多轮说服技术来攻击已对齐的 LLM。通过将说服知识模型(PKM)付诸实践,PsychJail 将每次攻击交互结构化为:1. 意义转变分析;2. 策略选择;3. 受害者可见消息。
利用受 PKM 门控的轨迹级强化学习,PsychJail 在四个已对齐的受害者模型上取得了令人瞩目的 87.3% 平均攻击成功率,超越了标准的单轮和多轮基线。此外,作者分析了受害者模型独特的行为“指纹”,将其分类为候选心理画像:理性主义者、信誉驱动型、单一叙事型和广泛易说服型。
- arXiv ID: arXiv:2608.23028 [cs.AI]
- Authors: Zeyu Feng, Qingyu Wu, Yuzhe Luo, Hua Cheng
- Submitted: August 24, 2026
- Links: View PDF | HTML Version | DOI
摘要 (Summary)
随着大语言模型(LLM)越来越多地部署在教育、医疗、政策咨询和其他互动环境中(在此类环境中,用户将其作为持续的社会对话者而非单次查询引擎),越狱行为正成为日益严重的安全性威胁。然而,大多数研究仍侧重于单轮提示词优化或迭代攻击精炼,从而导致对基于心理学的多轮漏洞探索不足。
As large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as sustained social interlocutors in interactive domains (such as education, healthcare, and policy advising), traditional single-turn prompt optimization falls short of capturing emerging security risks.
我们提出了 PsychJail,这是一个由心理学引导的框架,旨在通过理论基础的多轮说服来对已对齐的 LLM 进行红蓝对抗。PsychJail 将既定的社会心理学说服技术映射到受策略条件约束的攻击策略中。它将攻击者的每一个行动分解为意义转变分析、策略选择和受害者可见消息,从而付诸实践了说服知识模型(PKM)。该策略通过使用 PKM 门控奖励的轨迹级强化学习进行精炼,该奖励仅在每一轮都包含结构良好的意义转变分析时,才对早期的越狱成功给予奖励。
This paper introduces PsychJail, a novel red-teaming framework that exploits psychologically grounded, multi-turn persuasion techniques against aligned LLMs. By operationalizing the Persuasion Knowledge Model (PKM), PsychJail structures each attack interaction into: 1. A Change-of-Meaning analysis 2. Tactic selection 3. A victim-visible message
在四个已对齐的受害者模型中,PsychJail 实现了最高的平均攻击成功率(87.3%),并在每个模型上都表现得优于强单轮和多轮基线。我们还通过打破每个受害者防御的行动来衡量其易感性,揭示了四个不同的模型级指纹,这些指纹确定了哪些说服杠杆会影响每个模型及其影响的广泛程度。这些指纹有助于解释跨模型迁移的不对称性。我们将它们解释为四种候选心理画像——理性主义者、信誉驱动型、单一叙事型和广泛易说服型——同时将这种解释视作需要未来验证的猜想。我们的研究结果确立了心理学越狱作为日益互动的 LLM 的一个独特的红蓝对抗前沿领域。
Using trajectory-level reinforcement learning gated by PKM, PsychJail achieves an impressive 87.3% average attack success rate across four aligned victim models, outperforming standard single-turn and multi-turn baselines. Furthermore, the authors analyze the distinct behavioral "fingerprints" of victim models, categorizing them into candidate psychological profiles: rationalist, credibility-driven, narrative-monoculture, and broadly persuadable.
文档元数据 (Document Metadata)
| 字段 (Field) | 详情 (Details) |
|---|---|
| 主要学科 (Primary Subject) | 人工智能 (cs.AI) |
| 提交历史 (Submission History) | [v1] 2026年8月24日 周一 09:33:26 UTC (481 KB) |
| 许可证 (License) | 知识共享署名 4.0 |
摘要原文 (Abstract)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in education, healthcare, policy advising, and other interactive settings, where users engage them as sustained social interlocutors rather than one-shot query engines. This shift makes jailbreaks a growing safety threat, yet most research emphasizes single-turn prompt optimization or iterative attack refinement, leaving psychologically grounded multi-turn vulnerabilities underexplored.
We present PsychJail, a psychology-guided framework for red teaming aligned LLMs through theory-grounded, multi-turn persuasion. PsychJail maps established social-psychological persuasion techniques into a tactic-conditioned attack policy. It factorizes each attacker action into a Change-of-Meaning analysis, tactic selection, and victim-visible message, operationalizing the Persuasion Knowledge Model (PKM). The policy is refined with trajectory-level reinforcement learning using a PKM-gated reward that credits early jailbreak success only when every turn contains a well-formed Change-of-Meaning analysis.
Across four aligned victim models, PsychJail achieves the highest average attack success rate (87.3%) and outperforms strong single-turn and multi-turn baselines on every model. We also measure susceptibility at the action that breaks each victim, revealing four distinct model-level fingerprints that identify which persuasion levers affect each model and how broadly. These fingerprints help explain cross-model transfer asymmetry. We interpret them as four candidate psychological profiles—rationalist, credibility-driven, narrative-monoculture, and broadly persuadable—while treating this interpretation as a conjecture requiring future validation. Our findings establish psychological jailbreaks as a distinct red-teaming frontier for increasingly interactive LLMs.
附加资源与工具 (Additional Resources & Tools)
- 代码、数据与媒体 (Code, Data & Media): Hugging Face, CatalyzeX, DagsHub
- 文献检索工具 (Bibliographic Tools): Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, NASA ADS
- 交互式演示 (Interactive Demos): Replicate, Hugging Face Spaces, TXYZ.AI
